Post-hip-fracture knee pain in older adults prolongs their hospital stays: A retrospective analysis using propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Post-hip-fracture knee pain (PHFKP) occurs in ∼28%-37% of patients and contributes to a prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Analyses of LOS prolongation due to PHFKP have been limited to univariate analyses that do not consider important confounding factors. After adjusting for important confounding factors, we investigated whether the presence or absence of PHFKP makes a difference in LOS in patients with hip fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients who had undergone postoperative rehabilitation after surgery for a hip fracture. Demographic and clinical information, discharge parameters, and PHFKP development information were collected from the medical records. Using propensity score matching, we performed a two-group comparison of LOS, the functional independence measure (FIM) motor score (FIMm), FIMm gain, and FIMm effectiveness in patients with and without PHFKP. Six variables were included in the calculation of propensity scores: age, sex, body mass index, fracture type, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and independence in activities of daily living at discharge. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine the details of the relationships between LOS and (i) the time of PHFKP development and (ii) pain intensity. RESULTS: We analyzed the cases of 261 patients, of whom 87 (33.3%) developed PHFKP. In propensity score matching, 80 patients were each matched to a patient in the PHFKP or non-PHFKP group. After propensity score matching, a between-group comparison revealed that the PHFKP group had a longer LOS (+11 days) than the non-PHFKP group, and there were no differences in FIMm gain or FIMm effectiveness. The timing of PHFKP development and pain intensity were not related to the LOS. DISCUSSION: Even after adjusting for confounders, the development of PHFKP was found to prolong LOS. Clinicians should be aware of possible LOS prolongation in hip fracture patients with PHFKP.

Pooled Minimal Clinically Important Differences of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Patients With Early Subacute Stroke: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: Balance problems are common in patients with stroke, and the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a reliable and valid assessment tool for measuring balance function. Determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for assessing treatment effectiveness. This study aimed to determine the MCID of the Mini-BESTest in patients with early subacute stroke. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, 53 patients with early subacute stroke undergoing rehabilitation in inpatient units were included. The mean age of the patients was 72.6 (SD = 12.2) years. The Mini-BESTest, which consists of 14 items assessing various aspects of balance function, including anticipatory postural adjustments, postural responses, sensory orientation, and dynamic gait, was used as the assessment tool. The global rating of change (GRC) scales completed by the participants and physical therapists were used as external anchors to calculate the MCID. The GRC scale measured subjective improvement in balance function, ranging from -3 (very significantly worse) to +3 (very significantly better), with a GRC score of ≥+2 considered as meaningful improvement. Four methods were used to calculate the MCID: mean of participants with GRC of 2, receiver operating characteristic-based method, predictive modeling method, and adjustment of the predictive modeling method based on the rate of improvement. From the MCID values obtained using these methods, a single pooled MCID value was calculated. RESULTS: The MCID values for the Mini-BESTest obtained through the 4 methods ranged from 3.2 to 4.5 points when using the physical therapist's GRC score as the anchor but could not be calculated using the participant's GRC score. The pooled MCID value for the Mini-BESTest was 3.8 (95% CI = 2.9-5.0). CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-BESTest MCID obtained in this study is valuable for identifying improvements in balance function among patients with early subacute stroke. IMPACT: Determination of the MCID is valuable for evaluating treatment effectiveness. The study findings provide clinicians with practical values that can assist in interpreting Mini-BESTest results and assessing treatment effectiveness.

Structural Validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in Individuals With Spinocerebellar Ataxia: A Rasch Analysis Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the structural validity of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) in individuals with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). DESIGN: Methodological research on data gathered in a cross-sectional study. A Rasch analysis was conducted (partial credit model). SETTING: Inpatients in a hospital rehabilitation setting. PARTICIPANTS: A pooled sample of patients with SCA (N=65 [total 110 data]; 23 women, 42 men; mean±SD age 63.1±9.9y). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We evaluated the Mini-BESTest's category structure, unidimensionality, and measurement accuracy (0: unable to perform or requiring help to 2: normal performance). RESULTS: The Mini-BESTest rating scale fulfilled the category functioning criteria. The analysis of the standardized Rasch residuals showed the scale's unidimensionality, but there were 7 item pairs indicating local dependence. All of the items fit the underlying scale construct (dynamic balance), with the exception of item #1, "Sit to stand," which was an underfit. The Mini-BESTest demonstrated adequate reliability (person separation reliability=.87) and separated the patients into 5 strata. The item-difficulty measures ranged from -4.49 to 2.02 logits, and the person ability-item difficulty matching was very good (the mean of person ability=-.07 logits and the mean of item difficulty=.00). No floor or ceiling effects were detected. The keyform identified items with small (#11, "Walk with head turns, horizontal") and large (#3, "Stand on 1 leg") item thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-BESTest has a unidimensional balance assessment scale with good category structure and reliability even for individuals with SCA. However, it also has some inherent shortcomings such as fit statistics, local item dependencies, and item thresholds. The results obtained when the Mini-BESTest is administered to patients with cerebellar ataxia should, thus, be interpreted cautiously.

Rasch analysis of the Short Physical Performance Battery in older inpatients with heart failure.

PURPOSE: The physical function of older patients with heart failure (HF) is likely to decline, and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is widely used for its evaluation. No study has analyzed the SPPB by using Rasch model in these patients. The aim of this study was to examine the structural validity and item response of the SPPB in older inpatients with HF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, we investigated 106 older inpatients with HF. We evaluated the SPPB's rating scale structure, unidimensionality, and measurement accuracy (0 = poor performance to 4 = normal performance). RESULTS: The SPPB rating scale fulfilled the category functioning criteria. All items fit the underlying scale construct. The SPPB demonstrated adequate reliability (person reliability = 0.81) and separated persons into four strata: those with very low, low, moderate, and high physical performance. Item-difficulty measures were -0.59 to 0.96 logits, and regarding the person ability-item difficulty matching for the SPPB, the item was somewhat easy (the mean of person ability = 0.89 logits; mean of item difficulty = 0.00). CONCLUSION: The SPPB has strong measurement properties and is an appropriate scale for quantitatively evaluating physical function in older patients with HF.

For older adults with heart failure (HF), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is often used to measure physical performance.Rasch analysis revealed that SPPB had strong measurement properties in older adults with HF.This result may help rehabilitation professionals use the SPPB as a physical performance scale in clinical practice to aid decision-making in intervention planning.

Clinical prediction rules for multi surfaces walking independence using the Berg Balance Scale or Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test in persons with stroke.

BACKGROUND: A Clinical prediction rule (CPR) for determining multi surfaces walking independence in persons with stroke has not been established. OBJECTIVES: To develop a CPR for determining multi surfaces walking independence in persons with stroke. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of 419 persons with stroke. We developed a Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-model CPR combining the BBS, comfortable walking speed (CWS) and cognitive impairment, and a Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest)-model CPR combining the Mini-BESTest, CWS, and cognitive impairment. A logistic regression analysis was conducted with multi surfaces walking independence as the dependent variable and each factor as an independent variable. The identified factors were scored (0, 1) based on reported cutoff values. The CPR's accuracy was verified by the area under the curve (AUC). We used a bootstrap method internal validation and calculated the CPR's posttest probability. RESULTS: The logistic regression analysis showed that the BBS, CWS, and cognitive impairment were factors in the BBS model, and the Mini-BESTest was a factor in the Mini-BESTest model. The CPRs were 0-3 points for the BBS model and 0-1 points for the Mini-BESTest model. The AUCs (bootstrap mean AUC) of the CPR score were 0.89 (0.90) for the BBS model and 0.72 (0.72) for the Mini-BESTest model. The negative predictive value (negative likelihood ratio) was 97% (0.054) for CPR scores < 2 for the BBS model and 94% (0.060) for CPR scores < 1 for the Mini-BESTest model. CONCLUSIONS: The CPR developed herein is useful for determining multi surfaces walking independence.

White matter hyperintensity predicts independent walking function at 6 months after stroke: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: White matter hyperintensity (WMH) is reported to have a potential prevalence in healthy people and is a predictor of walking disability. However, WMH has not been adequately considered as a predictor of independent walking after stroke. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of WMH severity on walking function in patients with acute stroke. METHODS: The retrospective cohort study included 422 patients with acute stroke. The WMH severity from magnetic resonance images was evaluated using the Fazekas scale. Age, type of stroke, Fazekas scale, Brunnstrom motor recovery stage, Motricity Index, and Mini-Mental State Examination were used as independent variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted on the factors of independent walking at discharge and 6 months after onset, respectively. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis revealed that the Fazekas scale is not a predictive factor of independent walking at discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.65-1.22), but at 6 months (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.34-0.86). CONCLUSION: The WMH severity was a predictive factor of independent walking in patients with acute stroke after 6 months. WMH is a factor that should be considered to improve the accuracy of predicting long-term walking function in patients with stroke.

Motor imagery ability in baseball players with throwing yips.

The motor imagery ability is closely related to an individual's motor performance in sports. However, whether motor imagery ability is diminished in athletes with yips, in whom motor performance is impaired, is unclear. Therefore, this cross-sectional study aimed to determine whether general motor imagery ability or vividness of motor imagery specific to throwing motion is impaired in baseball players with throwing yips. The study enrolled 114 college baseball players. They were classified into three groups: 33 players in the yips group, 26 in the recovered group (previously had yips symptoms but had resolved them), and 55 in the control group. They answered the revised version of the vividness of movement imagery questionnaire (VMIQ-2), which assesses general motor imagery ability. Furthermore, they completed a questionnaire that assesses both positive and negative motor imagery vividness specific to baseball throwing. In the former, they responded to their ability to vividly imagine accurately throwing a controlled ball, whereas in the latter, they responded to the vividness of their experience of negative motor imagery associated with baseball throwing, specifically the image of a wild throw. No significant difference in the VMIQ-2 was found among the three groups. While no significant difference in the vividness of positive motor imagery for ball throwing was found in either first-person visual or kinesthetic perspectives among the three groups, the yips group exhibited significantly higher vividness of negative motor imagery than the control group in both perspectives. These results indicate that negative motor imagery specific to baseball throwing may be associated with symptoms of yips. Therefore, interventions addressing psychological aspects, such as anxiety, which are potential causes of the generation of negative motor imagery, may be necessary to alleviate the symptoms of yips.

Verification of the minimal clinically important difference of the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test in patients with subacute spinal cord injury.

CONTEXT: The number of patients with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) is increasing, and the Capabilities of Upper Extremity Test (CUE-T) is recommended for introduction in clinical trials. We calculated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the CUE-T using an adjustment model with an interval of 1 month. DESIGN: This was a prospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted with participants from the Chiba Rehabilitation Center in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The participants were patients with subacute CSCI. INTERVENTIONS: The CUE-T and spinal cord independence measure (SCIM) III were performed twice within an interval of 1 month. OUTCOME MEASURES: The MCID was calculated using an adjustment model based on logistic regression analysis. The participants were classified into an improvement group and a non-improvement group based on the amount of change in the two evaluations using the 10-point SCIM III MCID as an anchor. RESULTS: There were 52 participants (56.8 ± 13.5 years old, 45 men/7 women) with complete or incomplete CSCI: 18 in the improvement group and 34 in the non-improvement group. A significant regression equation was obtained when calculating the MCID, and the total, hand, and side scores were 7.7, 2.0, and 3.7 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The calculated MCID of the CUE-T in this study was 7.7 points. The results of this study provide useful criteria for implementation in clinical trials. Future studies should use patient-reported outcomes, a more recommended anchor, and calculate the MCID using methods such as the patient's condition.

Minimal important change in the Berg Balance Scale in older women with vertebral compression fractures: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral compression fractures, which are commonly associated with older age and osteoporotic fractures, have an increased risk of re-fracture. Therefore, improving balance is important to prevent falls. The minimal important change (MIC) has been recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful changes in rating scales. The MIC of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for use in older women with vertebral compression fractures has not been established. OBJECTIVE: To identify the MIC of the BBS that can be used in older women with vertebral compression fractures using predictive modeling methods and the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC)-based method. DESIGN: A retrospective longitudinal multicenter study. PATIENTS: Sixty older women (mean age ± standard deviation: 84.1 ± 7.0 years) with vertebral compression fractures who were unable to ambulate independently on a level surface. METHODS: A change of one point in the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) was used as an anchor to calculate the MIC of the BBS based on the change between admission and discharge. We calculated the MIC for the women whose FAC score improved by ≥1 point. We used three anchor-based methods to examine the MIC: the ROC-based method (MICROC ), the predictive modeling method (MICpred ), and the MICpred -based method adjusted by the rate of improvement and reliability of transition (MICadj ). RESULTS: Thirty-nine women comprised the "important change" group based on their FAC score improvement. In this group, the MICROC (95% confidence interval [CI]) value of the BBS was 10.0 points (5.5-15.5), with an area under the curve of 0.71. The MICpred (95% CI) value was 9.7 (8.1-11.0), and the MICadj (95% CI) was 7.0 (5.5-8.5) points. CONCLUSION: For women with vertebral compression fractures who are unable to ambulate independently, a 7.0-point improvement in the BBS score may be a useful indicator for reducing the amount of assistance required for walking.

Structural validity of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) with Rasch analysis for individuals with spinal cord disorders.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm the structural validity of the Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS). PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 104 Japanese individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) (age 63.5 ± 12.2 years; 64 with tetraplegia) with the TASS 1-3 times. We conducted a Rasch analysis to assess the TASS' unidimensionality, fit statistics, category probability curve, ceiling/floor effects, local independence, reliability, and difference item function (DIF). RESULTS: The TASS was observed to be a unidimensional and highly reproducible scale of item difficulty hierarchy that sufficiently identifies the superiority of the examinee's ability. The TASS was easy for the participants of this study. One TASS item was a misfit based on the infit and outfit mean square; another item also showed a DIF contrast for age. Several items were found to require a synthesis or modification of the content. The TASS showed a floor effect, and most of the non-scorers were individuals with a complete SCI. CONCLUSION: Our findings clarify the structural validity of the TASS, and our analyses revealed that the TASS includes an unfitness item and was less challenging for individuals with SCIs. The improvements suggested by these results provide important information for modifying the TASS to a more useful instrument.

Validity of the trunk assessment scale for spinal cord injury (TASS) and the trunk control test in individuals with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: The Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS) and the Trunk Control Test for individuals with a Spinal Cord Injury (TCT-SCI) are highly reliable assessment tools for evaluating the trunk function of individuals with SCIs. However, the potential differences in the validity of these two scales are unclear. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the criterion validity of the TASS and the construct validity of the TASS and TCT-SCI. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 30 individuals with SCIs (age 63.8 ± 10.7 yrs, 17 with tetraplegia). To evaluate criterion validity, we calculated Spearman's rho between the TASS and the gold standard (the TCT-SCI). To determine construct validity, we used the following hypothesis testing approaches: (i) calculating Spearman's rho between each scale and the upper and lower extremity motor scores (UEMS, LEMS), the Walking Index for SCI-II (WISCI-II), and the motor score of the Functional Independence Measure (mFIM); and (ii) determining the cut-off point for identifying ambulators with SCIs (≥ 3 points on item 12 of Spinal Cord Independent Measure III) by a receiver operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: A moderate correlation was confirmed between the TASS and the TCT-SCI (r = 0.68). Construct validity was supported by six of the eight prior hypotheses. The cut-off points for identifying ambulators with SCIs were 26 points (TASS) and 18 points (TCT-SCI). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that the contents of the TASS and the TCT-SCI might reflect the epidemiological characteristics of the populations in which they were developed.

Clinical Prediction Models for Nonmortality Outcomes in Older Adults With Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Several hip fracture clinical prediction models have been developed. We conducted this study to (i) map outcomes used in clinical prediction models for hip fracture, (ii) identify the domains and instruments of predictors, and (iii) assess the risk of bias. METHODS: We performed systematic searches of studies published from June 2002 to June 2023 in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, CiNii, and Ichushi databases. After the relevant articles were identified, we performed the data extraction and bias risk assessment. We used the Prediction Study Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) to assess each study's risk of bias. Outcome mapping was performed for the core outcome set of hip fractures. Qualitative synthesis and the PROBAST evaluation were performed on other-than-mortality core outcomes, which are difficult to target in rehabilitation. RESULTS: We screened 3 206 studies for eligibility; 45 studies were included in the outcome mapping, and 10 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Outcomes included mortality (n = 35), mobility (n = 8), and activities of daily living (n = 2). No clinical prediction models had pain or health-related quality of life as an outcome. Predictors were reported in 8 domains and 38 measures. The PROBAST evaluation showed a high risk of bias in all 10 studies that were eligible for a qualitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical prediction models had only mortality, mobility, and activities of daily living as outcomes. The development of clinical prediction models with pain and health-related quality of life as outcomes is necessary. Clinical prediction models overcoming the risk of bias identified in this study are also needed.

Minimal clinically important difference in 6-minute walk distance estimated by multiple methods in inpatients with subacute cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) contributes to the ability to determine the efficacy of physiotherapy interventions and make good clinical decisions. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the MCID for 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) among inpatients with subacute cardiac disease using multiple anchor-based methods. METHODS: This study was a secondary data analysis using only data from a multicenter longitudinal observational study in which 6MWD was measured at two time points. Based on the changes in 6MWD between baseline measurement and follow-up approximately 1 week after baseline measurement, the global rating of change scales (GRCs) of patients and physiotherapists, anchor method receiver operator operating characteristic curves, predictive models, and adjusted models were used to calculate the MCID. RESULTS: Participants comprised 35 patients. Mean (standard deviation) 6MWD was 228.9 m (121.1 m) at baseline and 270.1 m (125.0 m) at follow-up. MCID for each GRC was 27.5-35.6 m for patients and 32.5-38.6 m for physiotherapists. CONCLUSION: The MCID in 6MWD in patients with subacute cardiovascular disease is 27.5-38.6 m. This value may be useful in determining the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions and for decision-making.

Prognostic models of quality of life after total knee replacement: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and critically appraise prognostic models for quality of life (QOL) in patients with total knee replacement (TKA). METHODS: Subjects were TKA recipients recruited from inpatient postoperative settings. Searches were made on June 2022 and updated on April 2023. Databases included PubMed.gov, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science. Two authors performed all review stages independently. Risk of bias assessments on participants, predictors, outcomes and analysis methods followed the Prediction study Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS: After screening 2204 studies, 9 were eligible for inclusion. Twelve prognostic models were reported, of which 10 models were developed from data without validation and 2 were both developed and validated. The most frequently applied predictor was the pre-TKA QOL score. Discriminatory measures were reported for 9 (75.0%) models with areas under the curve values of 0.66-0.95. All models showed a high risk of bias, mostly due to limitations in statistical methods and outcome assessments. CONCLUSION: Several prognostic models have been developed for QOL in patients with TKA, but all models show a high risk of bias and are unreliable in clinical practice. Future, prognostic models overcoming the risk of bias identified in this study are needed.

The minimal clinically important difference of the mini-balance evaluation systems test in patients with early subacute stroke.

BACKGROUND: There is insufficient evidence regarding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest). OBJECTIVE: To determine the MCID of the Mini-BESTest in patients with early subacute stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, the Mini-BESTest score of 50 patients with stroke was obtained within 1 week of their admission, their Mini-BESTest and Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) scores were obtained at discharge. The GRCS scores were reported by both the patients and their physical therapists. We evaluated the correlation between the Mini-BESTest change scores and the GRCS by determining Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The MCID was calculated using 0.5× standard deviation (SD) for the distribution method and the change difference and receiver operating curve (ROC) for the anchor method. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of days between evaluations was 15.4 (4.8), and the Mini-BESTest score at admission was 17.7 (5.2) and 23.1 (3.5) at discharge. The correlation between the GRCS and the change in the Mini-BESTest score was 0.28 (p = .04) for the patients and 0.54 (p < .001) for the therapists. The MCID based on the distribution method was 3 points for 0.5× SD. The MCID values based on the anchor method were 2.3 for the change difference and 0.5 for the ROC in the patient-rated GRCS, and 4.2 for the change difference and 4.5 for the ROC in the physical therapist-rated GRCS. CONCLUSIONS: The MCID based on the anchor method was 4.2-4.5 points, and the MCID based on the distribution method was 2.3 points.

Predictors of post-hip fracture knee pain in hospitalized older adults with intertrochanteric femoral fracture.

BACKGROUND: Post-hip fracture knee pain (PHFKP) is an important issue that contributes to reduced gait speed and prolonged hospitalization. Femoral morphology has been reported to contribute to the development of PHFKP, but an independent association has not been confirmed and clinically applicable cutoffs for predicting the development of PHFKP remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether femoral morphology and knee extension range of motion limitation are independent factors in PHFKP and to determine cutoffs for predicting the development of PHFKP. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study. SETTING: Convalescent inpatient rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in a convalescent ward after intertrochanteric femoral fracture surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PHFKP development, radiographic femoral morphology (leg length discrepancy and neck-shaft angle), and knee extension range of motion limitation. RESULTS: PHFKP developed in 36 (35%) of the 103 patients enrolled. The PHFKP group had a longer hospital stay (p = .029), greater weight (p = .031), greater knee extension range of motion limitation (p = .001), and more varus neck-shaft angle (p < .001) compared to the non-PHFKP group. Varus neck-shaft angle (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.92; p < .001) and knee extension range of motion limitation (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30; p = .001) were significant factors for PHFKP development. Neck-shaft angle discrepancy and knee extension range of motion limitation demonstrated moderate accuracy in discriminating development of PHFKP according to receiver operating characteristic analysis, with cutoffs of 9.6° and 7.5°, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66-0.88; p < .001) for neck-shaft angle discrepancy and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56-0.79; p = .004) for knee extension range of motion limitation. CONCLUSIONS: Varus neck-shaft angle and knee extension range of motion limitation were identified as independent predictors of PHFKP. The cutoff for neck-shaft angle may be useful for predicting PHFKP development and to define an acceptable angle of fracture reduction to prevent PHFKP.

Cut-off values and sub-items of the Berg Balance Scale for walking-aid use in hospitalized older adults with a hip fracture: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) values that can be used to discriminate the use of a walking aid and the BBS sub-items that reveal the differences in the use of walking aids among hospitalized older adults with a hip fracture. METHODS: The cases of 77 older adults (age 80.8 ± 7.5 years) with a hip fracture who were able to walk independently in the hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to identify BBS scores that optimized the identification of subjects with different levels of aids. The BBS sub-items identifying differing among the walking aids were identified by a classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: The BBS scores were highest for no aid, a cane, and a walker, in that order. The ability to walk without an aid and the ability to walk without a walker showed moderate AUCs (0.824 and 0.865) with cutoff values of 51.5 and 45.5 points, respectively. The sub-items identified were Turning 360° (4 vs. < 4 points) as the best discriminator for using/not using a cane and Stool Stepping (≥ 2 vs. < 2 points) for using a cane or walker. CONCLUSION: The BBS is useful for determining whether to discontinue the use of a walker in individuals with a hip fracture.

Minimal clinically important difference of the short physical performance battery and comfortable walking speed in old-old adults with acute cardiovascular disease: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.

PURPOSE: The physical function of older adults age ≥ 75 years hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (CVD) often decrease. The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) is the smallest clinically meaningful difference due to therapy. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Comfortable Walking Speed (CWS) are physical function evaluations commonly used in people with CVD. This study aims to clarify the MCIDs of the SPPB and CWS in old-old adult with CVD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study of 58 old-old adults with acute CVD and rehabilitation. The MCID was estimated using the participants' and physical therapists' (PT) Global Rating of Change (GRC) scales as anchors for changes in the SPPB and CWS. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to measure the discrimination accuracy. RESULTS: The MCID of SPPB was 3 points when the GRC from PT was used as an anchor (AUC = 0.70). The MCID of CWS was 0.10 m/s when the GRC from participants and PT were used as anchors (AUC = 0.70 and 0.73, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The MCID of 3 SPPB points and 0.10 m/s CWS in old-old adults with acute CVD may help determine the effectiveness of therapy and improve prognosis.Implications for rehabilitationFor people with cardiovascular disease (CVD), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and comfortable walking speed (CWS) are often used to measure physical function.The MCID of SPPB and CWS was estimated to be 3 points and 0.10 m/s, respectively, in older adults with CVD aged ≥75 years.This finding is useful for clinicians to evaluate the efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation.

Berg Balance Scale is a Valid Measure for Plan Interventions and for Assessing Changes in Postural Balance in Patients with Stroke.

OBJECTIVES: After confirming the measurement properties of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in patients with stroke by conducting a Rasch analysis, this study sought: (i) to generate a keyform as a tool for goal-setting and intervention-planning; and (ii) to determine the appropriate strata for separating patients' postural balance ability. DESIGN: Methodological analyses of cross-sectional study data. PATIENTS: A pooled sample of 156 patients with stroke: mean (standard deviation) age 74.4 (12.9) years. METHODS: This study evaluated the BBS's rating scale structure, unidimensionality, and measurement accuracy (0: unable to perform or requiring help, to 4: normal performance) and then generated a keyform and strata. RESULTS: The BBS rating scale fulfilled the category functioning criteria. Principal component analysis of standardized residuals confirmed the unidimensionality of the test. All items fit the Rasch analysis. Person ability-item difficulty matching was good. Person reliability was 0.96, and the patients were divided into 9 strata. The keyform for the BBS will enable clinicians and investigators to estimate patients' postural balance ability and monitor their progress. CONCLUSION: The BBS has strong measurement properties. This study generated both a keyform that can contribute to clinicians' decision-making in goalsetting and intervention-planning and strata that can facilitate understanding of patients' abilities.